Page 25 - MCT November 2020
P. 25

training and experience than you do.  To make matters worse, many judges will put off the
         case for an extended period-of-time, while deciding if you can testify as an expert. That time is
         valuable, and often asked for by the opposing council because it is valuable in extending his or
         her own case preparation. If the opposing council feels that you are unqualified based on your
         methods and science relied upon, he can motion the court to restrict your testimony. Often
         this  will  result  in  settlement  agreements.  The  Daubert  Challenge  is  further  favorable  to  the
         opposing  attorney  because  it  gives  him/her  an  advanced  preview  of  the  sciences  and
         methodology you used in finding opinions and conclusions. The attorney is most likely mute or
         ignorant about what you know and about your profession, they are after all, in my opinion, like
         actors playing a part in a movie being watched by their client and the jury. The challenge gives
         them  that  edge  to  plan  further  for  their  rebuttal  and  cross  examinations  and  closing
         arguments.

         Surviving these challenges is not difficult if you take some damage control steps in advance of
         going to trial. I recommend putting together a portfolio that has your full resume, copies of
         training certificates and diplomas, for every course that you have taken. Supplement that with
         letters of recommendation and appreciation and commendation, awards, college transcripts,
         proof of military service (DD214) listing of trade and technical schools and their course subject
         matter and if possible news articles or other documents that will support your training and ex-
         perience. In advance of trial, supplement your case notes with when and where and by whom,
         you were trained or experienced, for each event that will require your testimony. As example; if
         you are going to testify that a vessel master was responsible for not taking alerting and evasion
         action  to  avoid  a  collision  at  night,  on  the  high  seas,  that  resulted  in  the  deaths  of  three
         passengers,  because  he  failed  to  recognize  that  a  red  and  green  light,  seen  together,  was
         indicative of a vessel approaching his, that it was on a collision course. You should be ready to
         document when and where and by whom you learned that information from, because you will
         likely be asked that question.

         There is yet another black cloud that travels along with this nightmare. You, the investigator,
         who was paid by a client to investigate his case, himself believing before employing you that
         you had the credentials to do the job for him, could be sued if you fail the Daubert Challenge.
         Your failure could mean the failure of his case. This could open you up to a host of liabilities
         like being sued for false advertising because you don’t have the training and or experience to
         perform what you say in your advertising that you can do. You may be sued for whatever the
         loss your client suffers from losing his case to the other party, for attorney fees, court costs
         and in some cases punitive damages. The answer to this is: do not advertise that you can do
         something  unless  you  can  prove  to  a  “Gatekeeper”  that  you  have  the  training  and  or
         experience to do it. Some states like California and Nevada, and many others, authorize their
         private investigator licensees to advertise and accept various investigative work, whether-or-
         not they have the documented training or experience to do the job. In this instance they are
         protected from criminal liability but not immune to civil liability that may arise out of a Daubert
         Challenge.  My  closing  suggestions  to  each  of  you  is  to  train  as  often  as  you  can  in  your
         profession and in any associated disciplines. Maintain your training records.

         The author is not an attorney and presents only his understanding of this subject matter, given to
         you in good faith. Anyone seeking legal advice or clarification of this article are encouraged to seek
         the advice and council of a licensed attorney. Additional information about the author can be
         found on his company (Tri State Detectives) Las Vegas web site;
         http://www.tristateinvestigators.com or you can e-mail him directly at jtbornpi@att.net. To
         learn more about investigations and associated disciplines, the author has published five
         books, his most recent, a full color hard covered, 370 page text book entitled “Investigator’s
         Manual, A Field Guidebook” by James T. Born, Author House Publishing Company, ISBN 978-1-
         5462-6085-1 available at Amazon, the internet or any book store.


                                                             25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29